Improving Your Practice’s RCM Function: The Case for Custom, Low-Code Solutions

When healthcare practices decide to improve their Revenue Cycle Management (RCM) functions, the typical path is to bring in an RCM consultancy. These firms promise to streamline processes, reduce denials, and increase collections, often through a revenue share model. While this approach can provide short-term gains, there are significant pitfalls that practices need to consider before committing to such arrangements.

The Pitfalls of Traditional RCM Consultancies

  1. Revenue Share Contracts: Many RCM consultancies operate on a revenue share model, where their earnings are directly tied to the revenue they help you collect. At first glance, this seems like a win-win situation. However, this model often misaligns incentives. The consultancy is motivated to maximize their revenue share, which can lead to a focus on short-term gains rather than sustainable, long-term improvements. Additionally, these contracts can be quite costly over time, as they take a percentage of all collections, not just the improvements they generate.
  2. Inflexibility and Lack of Control: RCM consultancies often come with a set way of doing things. They may implement rigid processes and software solutions that don’t align with the unique needs of your practice. This lack of flexibility can stifle innovation and limit your ability to adapt to changing circumstances. Moreover, once an outside firm is embedded in your processes, you might find yourself locked into their methods and tools, losing control over a critical aspect of your practice.
  3. High Costs and Dependence: Beyond the direct costs of revenue share agreements, there are hidden costs associated with becoming dependent on an external RCM firm. Over time, this dependence can lead to a loss of institutional knowledge within your practice, making you increasingly reliant on outside help. If the consultancy fails to deliver or if the relationship sours, you could be left with a broken system and a steep learning curve to rebuild your internal capabilities.

A Better Approach: Enable Your In-House Team with Custom, Low-Code Solutions

Given these challenges, a more strategic approach to improving your practice’s RCM function might be to build out custom, low-code infrastructure that empowers your in-house team. Here’s why:

  1. Greater Control and Flexibility: By developing your own low-code RCM solutions, you retain full control over your processes and can tailor them specifically to the needs of your practice. Low-code platforms allow you to build custom applications and workflows without needing extensive coding knowledge. This flexibility ensures that your RCM tools are directly aligned with your operational goals and can be quickly adapted as those goals evolve.
  2. Lower Total Cost: While there is an initial investment in setting up a low-code infrastructure, the long-term savings can be significant. You avoid the ongoing costs of a revenue share agreement and reduce dependence on costly external consultants. Instead, you invest in your own team and technology, building internal capabilities that pay dividends over time.
  3. Empowering Your In-House Team: Bringing RCM management in-house with custom tools enhances your team’s capabilities and knowledge base. This not only improves employee engagement and satisfaction but also leads to better decision-making and more sustainable RCM improvements. Your team becomes more agile and responsive, able to identify and address issues in real time rather than relying on an external firm’s schedule and priorities.
  4. Data Security and Compliance: Managing RCM in-house allows for better control over data security and compliance with regulations like HIPAA. When working with external firms, there is always a risk of data breaches or non-compliance. By building your own secure, compliant RCM systems, you can mitigate these risks and ensure that sensitive patient information is protected.

Conclusion

While RCM consultancies can provide valuable expertise and quick fixes, their models often lead to misaligned incentives, high costs, and a loss of control. By investing in custom, low-code infrastructure, healthcare practices can build a more flexible, cost-effective, and sustainable RCM function that empowers their in-house teams and provides better long-term results.

If your practice is considering ways to improve its RCM function, take a step back and think about whether a traditional consultancy model truly aligns with your long-term goals. Investing in your own team and technology may offer a more strategic path forward, giving you the control and flexibility needed to thrive in today’s healthcare landscape.